Company’s top level authorities should get their Employees in decision-making

Essay topics:

Company’s top level authorities should get their Employees in decision-making

The employees play a vital role in achieving company’s goals and objectives. The goodwill and the success of the company depend on its employees. So in my opinion company should involve its employees in decision making. In this highly competitive environment, management and employees should work together to achieve success and profit.

An employee’s feedback is very important for a company. Because a person working in a particular area or we can say a person who experiences something can give better feedback regarding that. The employees of the company are aware of every aspect of the company. They will always give the genuine review regarding anything. So their suggestion should be taken into consideration by top-level management as they know the true picture of the company.

Secondly, the involvement of employees will give positive vibes to the employees. Hence they will get motivated for work. If their suggestion will be taken into consideration they will do their work with more dedication and concentration. On the other side, if we treat them just an employee only, they will also do their work for the sake of doing it.

If we want our employees to give their 100% then we should give them decision-making rights and treat them as a part of the company.

In the end, for company’s success and profitability, top-level management and employees should work together. The contribution of both is essential for success. The knowledge, experience and ideas of employees will help the company to grow.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 83, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...l give positive vibes to the employees. Hence they will get motivated for work. If th...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24596774194 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09627012027 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 139.433497537 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512096774194 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 390.6 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.543352697 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.5294117647 104.977214359 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5882352941 20.9669160288 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35294117647 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 6.9802955665 186% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346939212493 0.242375264174 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113476745669 0.0925447433944 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877527714662 0.071462118173 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197639405349 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608054076551 0.0609392437508 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 12.6369458128 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.9458128079 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.32886699507 92% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.