Company’s top level authorities should get their employees in decision making process. Discuss.
In these days, people often take a variety of viewspoint when it comes to most daily issues. To give an illustration, while many believe that the top management of a company should take their employees’ suggestions into considersation when making a decision, other holds the opinion that this is not the case. This essay offers some insights in favor of the former outlook.
There are a number of reliable grounds that support the belief that the top management should consider employees’ suggestions carefully before making a decision. First and foremost, employees play an imperative role in the success of a business and therefore, their involvement in the decision making process is important for the future of the company. This is especially true because such involvement would enable employees to raise their concerns regarding their workplace and hence, decision and adjustment shall be made in time. Such improvement would, in turn, increase job satisfaction and ultimately, leads to improvement in productivity.
In addition, ample evidence from a number of studies also suggests that employees are more likely to come up with innovative initiatives. There is no doubt that employees, who are directly involved in certain tasks, can pinpoint certain potential problems and thus, be able to propose plausible solutions. Further, employers can raise their staffs’ loyalty and productivity by considering their proposal because employees are aware that their contributions are being valued and appreciated.
In conclusion, from the above analysis, it is obvious that the top management of a company should consider employees’ suggestion before making a decision.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, look, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61478599222 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15199595532 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591439688716 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8413180187 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.181818182 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 7.25397266985 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325176931183 0.242375264174 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113402300366 0.0925447433944 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103207113618 0.071462118173 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202959596948 0.151781067708 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667374139419 0.0609392437508 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.