Company top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to make any decisions. Discuss.
Recently, taking employees suggestion in decision making has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "should company authority take employees suggestion in decision making or not?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the economy standpoint, company managers are bound up inextricably with decision making, which indicates they lead to both important management and critical thinking. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between proposing suggestion and substantial profit as well as an exponential increase in revenue. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of economic issues is correlated positively with not only company expenditure but also political side effects.
Within the realm of management, without the slightest doubt, innovative idea attribute to strong leadership, in that it would come down to professional jobs, academic qualification, and unlimited knowledge. A salient example of such attribution is advertising, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take declining in sales for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint unskilled workers problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to x, x, and even x. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of practical experiments and global information.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that company manager should not take all employees suggestion in decision making. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, taking employees suggestion in...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
Recently, taking employees suggestion in decision making has spark...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the economy standpoint, company man...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e but also political side effects. Within the realm of management, without ...
^^^^^^^
Line 29, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xperiments and global information. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 33, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Line 33, column 183, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...hat company manager should not take all employees suggestion in decision making. However,...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9275862069 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19621692254 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686206896552 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1585675896 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.230769231 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215527337341 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530195344312 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094630782382 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13068489461 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115321071362 0.0609392437508 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.41 11.5310837438 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.