Recently, the phenomenon of education vs soft skills for getting a proper job and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that academic education is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that university degree can be a plus, and I will explain my reasons throughout this essay.
From the personal standpoint, being a university graduate can provide individuals with some noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that flourishing intellectual abilities, as well as mental capabilities, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, as I have passed university courses, I discovered that formal education could create agile minds. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both cognitive skills and self-confidence can be seen.
Within the realm of society, counting too much on getting experience might increase the consequences of illiteracy in a community. Moreover, fundamental aspects of developing soft skills instead of university studies relate to this reality that demerits of acquisitive skills pertain to lack of required knowledge in society. As a tangible example, a scientific research conducted by prestigious University of Chicago has asserted that the downside of practical experience is correlated negatively with required job vacancies in society. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of academic knowledge.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments in both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of university studies far outweigh the merits of developing practical skills to get a good job. Not only the advantages of academic educations prove the significance of making a creative mind, but also pinpoint professional career implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75899280576 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30325721122 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643884892086 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9854712021 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.416666667 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239035355108 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724859424322 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412040414968 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131404828301 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127879336457 0.0609392437508 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.