Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not.

Essay topics:

Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not.

Although such topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on extreme sports can lead to thought-provoking discussions. my view is that irrespective to the numerous arguments that exist on either side, all kinds of dangerous activities must need good training and motivation.

there are a number of reasons in favor of my stance. To commence with, these activities can lead to big injuries or even die. A good illustration here is a survey which carried out by an eminent professor at Queensland University who revealed that two-thirds of the sportspersons have been injured during making exercise so it needs much time to be professional in such fields.

Another pivotal aspect of the argument is that these kinds of games make the practitioner self-controlled and self-disciplined, but must be done under appropriate conditions. This exemplifies that bungee jumping not easy to be practiced and takes more than three years to be proficient in it.

I see that there is equally potential evidence to support the argument I have provided and hence my opinion is that extreme sports must be played under an experienced trainer and in a suitable environment.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
... lead to thought-provoking discussions. my view is that irrespective to the numero...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...t need good training and motivation. there are a number of reasons in favor of my ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...time to be professional in such fields. Another pivotal aspect of the argument i...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, third

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 1207.87684729 85% => OK
No of words: 194.0 242.827586207 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26804123711 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.92707691288 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28486029425 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.670103092784 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 379.143842365 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6551724138 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1007246335 50.4703680194 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.75 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 7.25397266985 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.089703564414 0.242375264174 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361801856453 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306417408576 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0510962768226 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201417396036 0.0609392437508 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.