The disadvantages of tourism in less developed countries are as great as the advantages. What is your opinion?
There has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see the people discussing the role of tourism in the less developed countries. Some people believe that tourism promotes local culture and economy, while others with the opinion of that tourism harm the national identity, and corrupt the existing system. There are some merits to both ideas; however, I opine that tourism not only promotes the economy but also the local culture of that country. The following essay will elaborate on the reasons for it and thus will lead to a plausible conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of reasons why tourism promotes the local culture. Tourism plays an important role in the development of the country's economy as well as it ensures the promotion of local culture. For example, when International tourists visit the less developed country, the individual will try to learn the local culture so as to understand its people and way of living. Some tourist can also share culture with the local people, thereby promoting multiculturalism and tolerance in the country.
Furthermore, with the help of tourism, the underdeveloped country has an opportunity to show the hospitality of that country to the rest of the world. This can improve the image of the country which could attract investors around the globe. Hence, more investor can invest in the local economy, thereby increasing the economy.
To recapitulate, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that tourism is critical and essential for the under-developed nation to prosper. I believe, the government of the growing countries should facilitate the policies in favour of promoting tourism.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ual will try to learn the local culture so as to understand its people and way of living...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, so, thus, well, while, as to, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24436090226 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83106670046 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537593984962 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8396107023 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.307692308 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202134376327 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777583170432 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557352372746 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130069450316 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188385355515 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.