Do Governments have a legitimate role in protecting citizens from the harmful effects of their own decisions to smoke or are such decisions up to an individual?
It is argued that governments should take the ownership or an individual responsibility to cut the detrimental effects of Tobacco consumption on general public. This essay agrees that the government should have a legitimate role to protect the citizens. This essay will first discuss on the the role of the goverment and then explain the role of individual as well.
Government has the power to curb the perils of smoking by raising the prices of cigarettes and other tobacco products. Apart from this, they can also ensure the manufactures to print the graphic content on the packs of tobacco products to bring the awareness to the public on harmful effects that smoking can bring. To implement these two techniques supreme power is essential and, obviously, general public do not have any to control. For instance, a study conducted by the Melbourne University in March 2018 found that after increment of prices along with the graphic content has reduced the smokers percentage by 30.
The government can also make a law to ban smoking in public places. This act can reduce the harmful effects as the law always comes with a penalty if one breaks it. It also enforces the smokers to use a designated area, such as smoking area, and avoid releasing harmful smoke into the climate which can impact public health. However, these techniques can be implemented with the support of citizens which shows that an individual's role is imperative. For instance, The New York Times published last year that banning public smoking indeed improvised the air quality in denced metros such as New York.
In conclusion, governments should take an active role and take proactive actions to curb the detribmental effects of tobacco consumption along with the public support.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ental effects of Tobacco consumption on general public. This essay agrees that the government ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...izens. This essay will first discuss on the the role of the goverment and then explain ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...izens. This essay will first discuss on the the role of the goverment and then explain ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...reme power is essential and, obviously, general public do not have any to control. For instanc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 595, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'smokers'' or 'smoker's'?
Suggestion: smokers'; smoker's
...ith the graphic content has reduced the smokers percentage by 30. The government can...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...support of citizens which shows that an individuals role is imperative. For instance, The N...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, then, well, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07216494845 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68809367261 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53264604811 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8447887976 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.538461538 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2531604816 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918819750883 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487241379408 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151049767161 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494249137417 0.0609392437508 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.