Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Recently, the phenomenon of making parents responsible for their kid's actions and its corresponding impacts on the society has sparked heated debate drawing the undivided attention of the public. Although contested by many that making parents be accountable is highly recommended, such issues might be regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a lawsuit to make the parents responsible can be a plus and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
First and foremost, minors driving motor vehicles on the roads leading a huge number of accident rate. An article published in The Hindu last year, for instance, stated that 63% of the road accidents involved a child driver. If the government bring these minor driver's parents under the umbrella of the lawsuit with heavy punishments, then the parents will deprive their kids to stop driving until they are matured enough.
If kids are misbehaving at schools and if it still continues after several warnings, then parents must take the ownership of their children's actions. If not, these kids astray from their educational path and soon involve in affray and could become gangsters as well. These negative ramifications can only be cut at the root level if the parents are accountable legally. For example, a research conducted by the University of Melbourne stated that 78% of prisoners had shown the same aggressive attitude at their schools. Had this been identified and cut accordingly, these prisoners wouldn't have end up in jail.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of making parents legally accountable for their kids actions far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this act prove the significance, but also pinpoint its crucial implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e ownership of their childrens actions. If not, these kids astray from their educa...
^^
Line 5, column 584, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ed and cut accordingly, these prisoners wouldnt have end up in jail. To conclude, w...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, so, still, then, well, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28428093645 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87253006162 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8874155237 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.538461538 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180125757704 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605090005976 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390357014533 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106229798263 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386465502016 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.