Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that?
Nowadays, playing exciting and dangerous activity has become a popular sports event among the young people all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether the dangerous activities should be supported or not?”. It is a widely held view, doing dangerous sports is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe, one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that adventure sports play a vital role in each society. Therefore, I express several reasons to support this idea. First and foremost is that it gives you a sense of self-confidence to overcome the challenges and fears, have physical fitness, achieve popularity, and reduce depression. Secondly, dangerous sports are in the category of lucrative sports so the industries of sports equipment will be able to grow their sports productions and boost up the revenue. A very tangible sportsperson, working at prestigious gyms conducted that such sports are so exciting that contribute to release adrenalin and the young people will be able to try new occasion.
However, undoubtedly the risky and dangerous sports events provide people with various negative points. It should be taken into account that permanent and serious damages happen as a result of adventure activities. Moreover, the expenditure of training and purchasing sports equipment is high in price. A very tangible example to illustrate would be the disability of young people who have been occurred by skiing, skydiving, and mountain climbing.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that playing dangerous sports under professional trainers must be supported. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and the individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41608391608 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96391529526 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611888111888 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7613643963 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.153846154 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116908163058 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401939293803 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043089194739 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702477822061 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435272762615 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.