Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing??What are the reasons for that?

Essay topics:

Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing??What are the reasons for that?

Recently, the phenomenon of dangerous activities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of lucrative sports is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that dangerous and exciting sports can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From the social and cultural standpoint, doing Adventurous sports can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that Facing up the challenges, as well as Being keen on exciting sports, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered more rush of adrenaline. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both Physical characteristics and health benefits apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of psychology, Being keen on exciting activities might increase the consequences of Developing self-confidence. Moreover, fundamental aspects of Stressful situations relate to this reality that the demerits of Vigorous exercise pertain to the dangerous sports. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of depression rate reduction is correlated negatively with Overcoming fear. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of breath-taking adventures.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of strenuous exercise far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of athletes’ experiences prove the significance of sports in culture, but also pinpoint body reactions implications.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8288973384 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39971160629 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661596958175 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9447319237 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.75 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0727010556478 0.242375264174 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0254587831289 0.0925447433944 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311629454515 0.071462118173 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0413175336298 0.151781067708 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202995042806 0.0609392437508 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.