Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of mass media and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that mass media is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a noticeable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that mass media can be a plus, and I will analyse throughout this essay.
From society standpoint, mass media can provide the society with some undeniable effects which are rooted in the fact that TV, as well as newspaper, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered all advantageous related to mass media and social communication. Therefore, beneficial ramifications of both mass media and social networks distinctly can be seen.
Within the realm of media science, diverse TV programs such as documentary programs might increase the consequences of awareness of individuals in the society. Moreover, detrimental aspects of TV programs and informative radio program relate to this reality that the demerits of social activities pertain to mass media. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that bad news is correlated negatively with detrimental impacts on the young people. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of mass media.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I firmly believe that the benefits of mass media far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only does social networks and advertisements prove the significance of effects of this phenomenon, but also pinpoints mass media implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52873563218 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20385790112 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1681614049 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18981600536 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735368964186 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0244185594554 0.071462118173 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11449009247 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237456458681 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.