Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products?" Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.

Essay topics:

Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products?" Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.

Undoubtedly, over packing products have serious effects on our environment and lifestyle. Some people think it is only the producer's problem but I am not one of them. In my point of view, it takes two to minimize the usage of over packed products. This essay will shed a light on how both, consumer and producer are responsible for avoiding the issue.

Customers have always a great power to make some products popular and some unpopular. In a market, customers have great numbers of choices to choose from which they could take an advantage of by choosing environment-friendly products. They should avoid over packed products. Nowadays, many well-educated people like me are concern about such issues and choose items carefully before purchased. This will definitely help to drop the sales of over packed items and eventually discourage factory to produce over packed products.

Moreover, there is a big role of producer to avoid extra packing of products. They should also be mindful and do some research on products and its effects on the environment before the products come to a market. This will help them to gain a good reputation as well. Additionally, not all customers are aware of such issues, it is a producer responsibility to avoid extra packing of items and comes with some alternative solutions. Besides this, a company can also save some money by cutting off extra packing cost. This is how the company can get benefited.

Overall, looking at above arguments, in my opinion, it is a responsibility of both parties and they are equally important to reduce extra packing of products.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'producers'' or 'producer's'?
Suggestion: producers'; producer's
...style. Some people think it is only the producers problem but I am not one of them. In my...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, look, moreover, so, well, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02996254682 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89379108584 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554307116105 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2940922337 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9375 104.977214359 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6875 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9375 7.25397266985 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256117930908 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922020690801 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726205757702 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159599731196 0.151781067708 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657385861572 0.0609392437508 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 12.6369458128 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.2921348315 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 59.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.