Do you think consumers should avoid over packed products or is it the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant examples with your own experience.
This issue raises a controversy about over packing products. The point of contention calls for it is analysis by various perspectives. However, it is evident that overpacking products is unhealthy for the environment.
At the outset, there are several reasons why it can be stated that the companies should avoid over packing and think more and work better for the environment. The first being is avoiding box and plastic bags. Furthermore, a critical element of this is if the Government adopt specific penalties for companies and adopt a campaign for people understand that overpacking it is not good and many ways. To cite an example on the matter in Australia every shops and supermarket are obligated to ask the customer if they want the plastic bags before they left the shop, and most people have your healthy bag in hands.
On the other hand, some people adopt an opposite view and tend to believe that bags and boxes keeping the product more beautiful. Correspondingly, it is a crucial note some people that prefer have beautiful boxes of shoes and beautiful bags from the shopping.
Moreover, this idea is well supported by the fact that when we have bags in the hands means that you spend some time with us, especially the women need feel this moment. Thus, a clear example of this in practice is when you go to the shopping we can see numerous people with different bags walking all the shopping and you can see that they feel like a therapies moment in hands.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that overpacking products is a bad thing for the environment. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'hands'' or 'hand's'?
Suggestion: hands'; hand's
... the fact that when we have bags in the hands means that you spend some time with us,...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 354, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'therapies'' or 'therapy's'?
Suggestion: therapies'; therapy's
...g and you can see that they feel like a therapies moment in hands. In conclusion, I firm...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89864864865 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73156882121 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5846067123 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.538461538 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141905430561 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505318289176 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408955388995 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0691444613151 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292134753076 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.