One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the usage of English language as an international language. As such, there are both merits and demerits to this trend, although I am of the opinion that the former outdo the latter.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that is help people to communicate from different background and culture. Not only can they increase their communication skills while doing trade to other countries, but they can also build their confidence in communication process. Needless to say, all these merits stand people in good stead, when it comes to improving their skills.
There are, however, some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of English language as a global language. The primary one stems from the fact that it can effects the cultural values of country. Besides,it is not welcome by local individuals of country because they don’t want to speak foreign language. Hence, it is apparent why many are against of English language.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having some drawbacks, the benefits of English as global language are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'effect'
Suggestion: effect
...ary one stems from the fact that it can effects the cultural values of country. Besides...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... the cultural values of country. Besides,it is not welcome by local individuals of ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 1207.87684729 87% => OK
No of words: 206.0 242.827586207 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08252427184 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74534627957 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 139.433497537 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601941747573 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 379.143842365 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1036339888 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1818181818 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153546100651 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528301330959 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792485627644 0.071462118173 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104683574475 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787760929264 0.0609392437508 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.