Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?
The idea of improving the network of public transport instead of builds more roads is widely debated, with many people claiming that the benefits it offers are no match for its drawbacks. However, I do not entirely agree with this and I will explain in this essay.
There are a myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that by improving the network of public transport public can easily access to public transport and reach to their destination in minimum time. Not only can government reduce cost of building new roads, but it also helps them to control pollution level. Needless to say, all these merits stand public in good stead, when it comes to improving their life style.
Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that public can also reduce their expenses by using public transport and by not buying own vehicle. In addition, developing countries can also use this technique for the economic and social development. Hence, it is apparent that why many are in favour of using network of public transport.
In the view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of public transport are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...ill explain in this essay. There are a myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. Th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 1207.87684729 81% => OK
No of words: 202.0 242.827586207 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84653465347 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46507314878 2.71678728327 91% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 139.433497537 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569306930693 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 379.143842365 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.148563192 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.25397266985 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280653824643 0.242375264174 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996840567295 0.0925447433944 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946050670519 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155977956126 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625744326361 0.0609392437508 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.5310837438 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 55.0591133005 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.