Right amount of motivation and practice can teach one better than the training given to him in a class room.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people arguing training is better for learning than motivation and practice. As such, there are both merits and demerits to this trend, although I am of the opinion that the former outdo the latter.
There are myriads of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that no matter how much-motivated one is, without the right assistance and direction from an accomplished expert, all the hard work is likely to go in vein. Not only do teachers have expertise and experience in dealing with numerous issues concerning teaching as per student’s calibre, but they also capable of keeping the student motivated. Needless to say, all these merits stand youngster in good stead, when it comes to attaining knowledge successfully.
Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that a conventional learning environment means the right amount of discipline. Besides, students also receive encouragement from each other and learn from each others’ mistakes. Hence, it is apparent that why many are in favour of class room training.
In view of the argument outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of topic are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: IN_VEIN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in vain' (=unsuccessfully)?
Suggestion: in vain
...pert, all the hard work is likely to go in vein. Not only do teachers have expertise an...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 1207.87684729 88% => OK
No of words: 206.0 242.827586207 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13106796117 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90400424324 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679611650485 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 379.143842365 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8911412765 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.7 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 7.25397266985 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200114734021 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060253955892 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610550712475 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992511253179 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209875824755 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.