Do you think formal written assessments in today's world to assess students’ performance is effective or not? Discuss your viewpoint on this and support your answer with examples.
Since the beginning of teaching techniques, written assessments have been used to assess individuals’ knowledge. While some people believe formal written are ineffective when assessing learners capabilities, others believe written assignments contribute significantly on the assessment of students.This essay will discuss why formal written assignments are incapable of evaluating scholars.
Firstly, Accurate assessments cannot be given by writing tasks which are incapable of assessing students. Obviously, these evaluations are incomplete and unfair on their methods when collecting information to assess students. For example, research shows that History exams are dependent on erroneous ancient facts and based on fake comments of elderly human-beings.Formal written assignments wrongly asses scholars which evaluations differ considerably of the real.
Secondly, written assessments fail when evaluating the intelligence of scholars. Certainly, these written evaluations are incapable of assessing analytical skills which are imperative for ultimate qualification. A recent study found that young students overgrow theoretical knowledge through external stimulation, which means through real experiences. Writing tasks inaccurately assess the intelligence of students which are evaluated by writing jobs.
This essay discussed why formal written evaluation could not clearly define scholars skills. In view of the arguments outlined above, formal written assessments have negative outweigh when evaluating academics and their knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ificantly on the assessment of students.This essay will discuss why formal written a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Formal
...n fake comments of elderly human-beings.Formal written assignments wrongly asses schol...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 20.9802955665 38% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 204.0 242.827586207 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.63235294118 5.00649968141 132% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22816728405 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612745098039 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.57093596059 127% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.127541093 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222785404014 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10095328941 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501099800082 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152540203075 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501026113463 0.0609392437508 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 12.6369458128 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.37 53.1260098522 36% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 21.17 11.5310837438 184% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 55.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.