Do you think that formal written examinations are a good way to assess knowledge at school?
Recently, formal written examination in regards to knowledge assessment at school has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the Pros and Cons of formal written examination?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the general standpoint, formal education is bound up inextricably with examination, which indicates it leads to both written assignment and oral exam. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between course syllabus and overall score as well as an exponential increase in student's performance. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far support the contention that the likelihood of traditional methods is correlated positively with not only human capacity but also long-term memory.
Within the realm of educational system, without the slightest doubt, modern teaching techniques attribute to team working tasks, in that it would come down to hard-working, practical skills, and personal experience. A salient example of such attribution is oral evaluation, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take general knowledge for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint old-fashioned educational methods problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to critical thinking, problem solving, and even agile mind. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of modern evaluation ways.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the drawbacks of written examination are outweigh its benefits. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
Recently, formal written examination in regards to knowledge assessment at school has spar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pects of that throughout this essay. From the general standpoint, formal educ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... capacity but also long-term memory. Within the realm of educational system, ...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...otal role of modern evaluation ways. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 188, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...he drawbacks of written examination are outweigh its benefits. However, with the benefit...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80272108844 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21408954518 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690476190476 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0437500777 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.230769231 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147373081993 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388830762355 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900151191816 0.071462118173 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0935679013665 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106456076134 0.0609392437508 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.