Do you think schools should include art, music and sport for children literacy and numeracy?
The discussion on whether music, art and sports should be taught at schools is a debatable topic and people all around the globe are divided in their opinions. The subject attracts the majority of views from people and remains a hot topic among people of concern. In this essay, I shall scrutinize both sides of views by providing examples and explanation before drawing my conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments in favour of my instances. The most preponderant one lies in the fact that art, music and sports develop different areas of the brain compared with traditional subjects. In order to get an authentic explanation, these classes enhance education therefore they are prominent for education. The most impeccable example that I could quote here is that a research conducted by Harvard University suggests that children, who study extracurricular activities, are more likely to succeed on their lives. Hence, I can substantiate my idea that art, music and sports play a vital role in younger’s education.
Those who disagree with these ideas might have a cogent notion and could assert that there are drawbacks for these classes. Another angle on this debate suggests that the high investment on extracurricular activities lead to a lack of attention to the pivotal subjects. The most pertinent example that could be provided here is that some schools in Austria increased their students' performance by investing in superior faculty members.
To conclude, after taking the above-stated points into consideration, I am inclined to believe that music, art and sports as part of a school’s curriculum are prominent and should not me overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 650, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vital role in younger's education. Those who disagree with these ideas migh...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, so, then, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27881040892 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98395167636 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60594795539 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5647903606 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.25397266985 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196420692355 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626030061888 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680487386742 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116593129724 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504206669266 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.