Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the fact that video conversation with doctor is beneficial for patient. Critics, however, claim that visual assessment is more reliable source to approach patient. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the benefits and drawbacks of this statement before deducing any conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of argument discussing the fact that video chats with medical professionals are beneficial or not. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that in certain medical emergencies, where expert opinion from specialist is needed. Hence, in this situation medical professional might not available at that time, so it would be helpful to discuss medical condition with professional. As a prime example, we are living in the world of technology, where online opinion during the presence of expert panel is beneficial for patient.
On the another hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that management of patient in general situations require presence of doctor to take right decision after monitoring the patient closely. Perhaps, this would be the most suitable options to deal with patient in critical senerios.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that with few exceptions medical treatment in the presence of medical professional is mandatory and beneficial for patient’s life. Therefore, ideas that will bring benefits would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...tient. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the benefits and drawbacks of this statemen...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, therefore, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61061946903 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94188895564 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597345132743 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0579141936 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.272727273 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161665262113 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623629734454 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453822541483 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101674905031 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037046729283 0.0609392437508 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.