Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Of late there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the fact that advancement in technology has decreased mortality rates across the world. Critics, however claim that this improvement is rather curve for this society. I personally believe that former argument is more realistic and worth to believe. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the key features of this essay before deducing any final conclusion.
At the out set there are myriad of arguments discussing the fact that human life expectancy has increased due to medical technology. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that from recent decades, it has been greatly observed that across the world greater number of non-curable diseases has cured due to introduction of advanced medical procedures. As a prime example, TB is largely been cured in almost every nation after the provision of vaccination and proper treatment . Moreover, polio disease is almost eradicated through vaccines across the world.
Another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that people who consider these blessings as a curse are those who believe that increase human life expectancy has great contribution in increasing world’s population. Therefore, they think that growing population welcomes poverty, unemployement rates, crime and other health issues.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that technological advancements are not only beneficial for human life expectancy but also give freedom to individual to fight against the illnesses. Therefore, ideas that will bring benefits would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'curved'.
Suggestion: curved
...r claim that this improvement is rather curve for this society. I personally believe ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lieve. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the key features of this essay before deduc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 487, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...sion of vaccination and proper treatment . Moreover, polio disease is almost eradi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64344262295 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93027682692 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668032786885 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8427043664 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118236711544 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373090697061 0.0925447433944 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486363970525 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0703300619552 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281523683631 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.