Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge amongst the prodigies discussing the fact that practical skills are effective to teach than bookish knowledge. I, personally believe that this statement is more realistic and worth to believe. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the main features of this argument before deducing a final conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments discussing the fact that experience learning is more effective to teach someone than through other ways. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that an experience person has plethora of learning skills that he gained from his experience. Therefore, he could br able to deliver that knowledge in more proficient manner. As a prime example, in most of the nations, primary schooling systems have adapted the strategy of hiering an experienced base tutors to provide quality of education.
Another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that experience based teaching is the best possible approach to teach students at any level. Moreover, although books contain plethora of material and it practical application is incomplete with experience.
To recapitulate, the aforementioned propounds that experience is not only the most suitable approach of teaching but only the best possible option for knowledge acquisition. Therefore, ideas that will bring benefits would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lieve. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the main features of this argument before d...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'tutor'?
Suggestion: tutor
...strategy of hiering an experienced base tutors to provide quality of education. Ano...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, moreover, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1195.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 217.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5069124424 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90044486808 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617511520737 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.031037006 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.636363636 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195144621139 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664315377035 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593407830839 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108310550711 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304614307905 0.0609392437508 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.