Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics? Pros & Cons
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies in a trend to see prodigies discussing the fact that libraries should adopt latest technologies to search different material. However, in this essay, I shall highlight some pros and cons of this argument before deducing any conclusion. I, personally think that this idea is more realistic and worth to believe.
At the outset, there are myriad of argument associated with the utilization of digital gadgets to find useful material in libraries. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that in this contemporary world, digital appliances can help people to find plethora off material in short period off time. Moreover, certain digital apps are quiet useful to collect anormous information in addition to recent researches. As a prime example, this practice has been observed in some well known libraries to obtain significant information of any subject.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that where there are some pros, cons must exist. This latest trend is some how reduces the reading habits of readers and it might sometimes be difficult for the old people, who have least experience with these latest gadgets. But this statement does not holds fully water.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that digital gadgets are not only useful for present generation but also contain more information than books and magazines. Thus, ideas that will bring benefit would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'adopt the latest'.
Suggestion: adopt the latest
...scussing the fact that libraries should adopt latest technologies to search different materi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: SOME_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'somehow'?
Suggestion: somehow
..., cons must exist. This latest trend is some how reduces the reading habits of readers a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the least'.
Suggestion: have the least
...es be difficult for the old people, who have least experience with these latest gadgets. B...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'hold'
Suggestion: hold
...st gadgets. But this statement does not holds fully water. To recapitulate, forego...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, in addition, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32780082988 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68812424356 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651452282158 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0452704386 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216543680432 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685910025002 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585179640915 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116083264688 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475846343986 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 77.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.