In developing countries, tourism has disadvantages or advantages?
Of late there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the fact that tourism is either beneficial or not for some developing nations. Some people opine that tourism has no such role in development of country’s economy. Critics, however, claim that tourism is the welcoming trend to build strong economy in underdeveloped countries. I, personally believe that later argument is more realistic and worth to believe.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments associated with impact of tourism on developing nations. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that economical growth is accelerated with the strong hold of tourists industry. As a prime example, according to the recent survey, tourists industry in Thailand has flourished to larger extent and as a result, this country is able to build strong economic power amongst other nations.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that tourism provides chance to learn diversity of cultures and promotes cultural civilization. Therefore, its is not only beneficial for people but also for government to grab maximum benefits and to build strong economy.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that advantages of tourists industry triumphs over it’s disadvantages. Thus, ideas that will bring benefit would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...conspicuous one stem from the fact that economical growth is accelerated with the strong h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and as a result, this country is able to build strong economic power amongst othe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, so, therefore, thus, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 209.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58851674641 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94133477988 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641148325359 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9918406383 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.181818182 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194382471238 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683533260101 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070521703275 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0987659344967 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783994535752 0.0609392437508 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.