Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics? Pros & Cons
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the fact that introduction of digital gadgets in libraries are essential to provide knowledge in more effective way. Critics, however, claim that this amendment would be less productive and disturbs the traditional way of learning in libraries. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the benefits and drawbacks of this statement before deducing any conclusion.
At the outset there are myriad of argument discussing the fact that should it be mandatory to introduce digital appliances in libraries for effective learning. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that in this contemporary world, where most of the youngsters rely on technology in any field. Hence, introduction of technology in libraries would be a positive step to maintain the strength in libraries. As a prime example, some western societies are working on this strategy to provoke youngsters towards libraries and develop the trend of gathering information both from reading books and from online websites.
On the another hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that excessive interference of technology would lessen the demand of book reading habits of youth. But this statement does not hold fully water. One has to remember, these are just common assumption rather common facts.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that benefits of digital gadgets triumph over its’ drawbacks. Therefore, ideas that will bring benefit would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...aries. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the benefits and drawbacks of this statemen...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, so, therefore, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54621848739 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90136318647 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600840336134 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8092273753 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117415501636 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402421524991 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545009957615 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0646430077126 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398373435314 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.