Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics? Pros & Cons
The use of digital gadgets in library to provide information on different topics. My view is that to provide information to people in institution like library, the latest available technology should be used.
Firstly, the most conspicuous one is that our world is fast changing. Internet has become a part and parcel of life. In such times, when the tablets are being used even in schools, only books are not sufficient to provide the satisfaction for hunger of knowledge. Moreover, the knowledge is changing everyday. With all due respect, a book once written is written, but the current information can only be obtained from internet. So, why not use this technology in library, which is like a temple for students. Thus, needless to say, all these associated merits of using technically advance digital gadgets makes a strong point of using them in libraries.
Moving on to consider the opposite argument put forward by critics, some people maintain that only books should be used in library as they believe that bringing digital gadgets in library will do more harm than good. Libraries should maintain a pin drop silence which is not possible with the coming of gadgets. Furthermore, the novelty of books cannot be replaced.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of digital gadgets in library are far more than its negatives and with technology creeping in our lives, using it in library is imperative.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'will' and 'yield'.
Suggestion: will never yield
...Although this topic, in all likelihood, never will yield a consensual agreement, a constructive ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ge. Moreover, the knowledge is changing everyday. With all due respect, a book once writ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17056856187 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89499224153 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588628762542 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6760141654 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.066666667 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 7.25397266985 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323239370069 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866958527488 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874737813016 0.071462118173 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195981953562 0.151781067708 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620907348846 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.