In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. Discuss your opinions and give examples.
The advantages and disadvantages of tourism in underdeveloped countries. Although this topic, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on it can lead to thought-provoking discussions. In my view, developing countries have certain advantages through which they can improve their tourism drastically.
The biggest strength of developing countries is the vast scope to improve and succeed. The underdeveloped countries often have immense untapped potential. For example, India uses its historical monuments and cultural values to improve its tourism in places like Agra, Udaipur, Gandhinagar, Chennai, Hyderabad etcetera. Also, American countries like Mexico and Brazil use their ethnic cuisines to attract tourists from all over the world. People from well-to-do countries like to travel to these places and experience the unique adventure such countries offer.
From a social standpoint, most of the developing countries have traditions which are still dated to ancient history. The citizens of first world countries find it educative to understand these traditions. Moreover, the Asian and African tribes have the knowledge which is even better than the modern science. For example, the knowledge of homeopathic and herbal medicine in Himalayas has attracted millions of tourists so far.
In conclusion, taking all points into consideration, I am inclined to believe that men and women around the world want to explore more than just skyscrapers and technology, and they are hungry for the adventure which is closer to the nature. The developing countries are in better position to provide such experience and hence, they have advantage in enhancing their tourism industry.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, moreover, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62587412587 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04500490446 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4834051454 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.266666667 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0926022028236 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0315491003682 0.0925447433944 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531899091608 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0599881904823 0.151781067708 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695035771903 0.0609392437508 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.