The importance of cars and airplanes in modern life. Give examples.
Of late there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the fact that personal cars and airplanes are essentials to travel. However, some people opine that escalating depandance on personal vehicles create environmental hazards and health issues. Critics, however claim that airplanes and cars are more reliable and time saving technologies for every person living in this contemporary world. This essay will assert both sides of this contention before deducing a reasonable conclusion.
At the outset there are myriad of arguments associated with benefits of cars and airplanes. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that brings mantle satisfaction and trouble free travelling. As a prime example, travelling in personal car gives us freedom of choosing good music and relaxing feelings for all the family members. Moreover, punctuality is not an issue for car user rather to face heavy crowd on bus or train stations. I think that this statement alone is sufficient to favour car usage.
on the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that travelling by air covers the largest journeys in a short interval. Therefore, in emergency situations or for business purposes airplane is the most convenient way to travel. But there is another flip side of a coin, these technological advancements make people more prone to develop illnesses, which include heart diseases and obesity related other issues.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that despite several drawbacks, usage of cars and airplanes become the necessity of this society. Thus ideas that will give benefits would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of arguments associated with benefits of cars and airplanes. Firstly, the most co...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...e is sufficient to favour car usage. on the other hand, another pivotal facet p...
^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'purposes'' or 'purpose's'?
Suggestion: purposes'; purpose's
...in emergency situations or for business purposes airplane is the most convenient way to ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...s become the necessity of this society. Thus ideas that will give benefits would be ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, moreover, so, therefore, thus, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45038167939 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84342691611 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675572519084 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4667019374 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161491706066 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542205984904 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443349486138 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983379664212 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433368945497 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.