In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. Do you agree or disagree?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the fact that in urban areas, larger malls should be replaced by smaller ones. Critics, however, claim that larger shopping centres are more beneficial for customers to buy things under one roof. I, personally believe that later argument is more realistic and worth to believe. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the advantages of huge shopping malls in cities to elaborate my view point.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments associated with the trend to replace small shops with malls in cities. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that availability of local and international brands under one roof is more feasible for families, specially for working people. Moreover, it provides a huge oppurtunity to enjoy play areas and food court under one roof. As a prime example, in developed countries, trend of shifting smaller shops to larger malls is quiet visible to overcome parking issues and overcrowding.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that larger malls have availability of both credit and cash paymont methods for every type of individual. However, availability of prayer areas, washrooms are another facilities to support larger malls. Therefore, larger malls are flexible and suitable option for people to buy things.
To recapitulate, the foregoing discussion propounds that benefits of larger malls triumph over smaller shops. Therefore, ideas that will bring benefit would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 396, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lieve. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the advantages of huge shopping malls in ci...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32128514056 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70393586704 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614457831325 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0021366887 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.923076923 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173612966829 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594195858798 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674124393304 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956819017468 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645932467035 0.0609392437508 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.