Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the fact effective learning needs more concentration and peaceful environment, rather to waste time in group studies. Critics, however, claim that combine studies is the most effective approach to grab maximum off information during studies. In my opinion, the former the later statement is more realistic and worth to believe. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the facts before deducing a reasonable conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments associated with advantages off group studies. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that combine studies provide an environment to achieve maximum of knowledge from different people. As a prime example, recent survey on effectiveness of the studies has concluded that group discussion is the most important way to grab variety of view points and solution to any problem.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that students or employees can be able to find the solution of their quaries in short period of time without being wasting too much time on concentrating on particular subject for so long. As a matter of fact, it i unquestionable that combine study is more effective.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that group discussion is far better that study alone in a peaceful environment. Thus, ideas that will bring benefit would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 446, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lieve. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the facts before deducing a reasonable conc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... the solution of their quaries in short period of time without being wasting too much time on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, in short, as a matter of fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27966101695 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92312693387 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631355932203 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6427762526 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.272727273 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200688137334 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070715356062 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447857271955 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110344533385 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359136949804 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.