In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. Do you agree or disagree?

Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the fact that large shopping malls should be replced by small shops. Some people opine that overcrowding and parking issues are the most important to choose smaller stores than mega shopiing malls. Critics, however claim that shopping malls provide spectrum of products than local shops. This essay will assert both side of this contention before deducing a reasonable conclusion.

At the out set, there are myriad of arguments associated with the replacement of mega shopping malls to small businesses. Firstly, the most conspicuous is that people can find variety of products under one roof in mega malls, as a prime example being a working mother, my priority is to save maximum of time and enjoy shoping with my kids in suitable and perfect environment, which includes, play area, variety of options for shoping and food court. Therefore, I personally believe that this is the welcoming trend for present situation.

On the other hand another pivotal facet pertaining to this arguement is that bigger shopping centers are not ony bebeficial for people but also for government in relation to taxes. Hence, these malls are well established and govern by authorities who deal with these things more efficiently.

To recapitulate, all these amenities cannot be offered bysmall businesses and fore going discussion propounds that mega shopping malls have immense benefits to the modern society. Therefore, ideas that will bring benefit would be cordially welcomed.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al facet pertaining to this arguement is that bigger shopping centers are not ony...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, so, therefore, well, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34836065574 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65220304647 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668032786885 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.9627998895 50.4703680194 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.636363636 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188884313658 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743755201671 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894882793034 0.071462118173 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104251979436 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530110312441 0.0609392437508 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.