In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. Do you agree or disagree?
Of late there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the fact that large shopping centers should replace small shops in cities and towns. Critics, however claim that local shops are easy access to every person at every where. I personally, believe that former statement is more realistic and worth to believe. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the common facts regarding this issue before deducing a final conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments discussing the fact that large shopping malls are the easiest possible option for everyone in any aspect. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that under one roof, provision of all basic facilities with comfortable environment are the most feasible options to shop from any local or international brand. As a prime example, branches of Dolmen mall in Pakistan and Dubai mall in middle East are the main examples of large shopping malls that facilitates their customers with play area, gym, almost all well known clothing and shoe brands. Moreover, perfect facility of prayer areas, separate areas for nursing mothers, grocery stores and secure parking areas are provided to give comfort to the customers.
Another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that large shopping malls provides cinema facility in order to provide entertainment to customers along with shopping. Furthermore, families have an ease of enjoy shopping along with kids due to separate tracks for prams and wheel chairs foe disabled and old citizens.
To recapitulate, the foregoing discussion propounds that large shopping malls are not only best suitable facility provides not only to adult family members but also for children of all ages. Therefore, that will bring benefits would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng centers should replace small shops in cities and towns. Critics, however claim...
^^
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: EVERY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'everywhere'?
Suggestion: everywhere
...hops are easy access to every person at every where. I personally, believe that former stat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lieve. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the common facts regarding this issue befor...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3041958042 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56684558725 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643356643357 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2739716177 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.416666667 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268158019009 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915631487358 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857927053356 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153681364022 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440710983861 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.