Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the fact that advancements in medicine have great contribution to decrease mortality rate. I, personally think that this statement is more realistic and worth to believe. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the examples of medical advancements to increase life expectency in humans.
At the outset, there are myriad of argument to discuss impact of technological advancements on human health. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that in this contemporary world, every developed nation is trying to indroduce latest and innovative technological procedures to cure serious health issues. As a prime example, recently America has introduced proton therapy to kill cancerous cell, which only targets the affected cell and has minimum side effects. Consequently, this procedure is quiet beneficial to cure advance stages of irreversible cancers and increase life expectancy of patients.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that invention of new therapeutic drugs to manage critical diseases are highly effective and ultimately, would result in decrease mortality rates. For instance, introduction of laproscopy anf early diagnosis of diseases during pregnancy are the ways to increase expectancy of infants.
To recapitulate, forgoing discussion propounds that advancement in medical interventions is the responsible factor to extend human life. Thus, ideas that will bring benefits would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lieve. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the examples of medical advancements to in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., I shall highlight some of the examples of medical advancements to increase life...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, so, thus, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 233.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71673819742 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07538806526 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665236051502 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9467892025 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.090909091 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108051483463 0.242375264174 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424097520216 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554146674239 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0663095001523 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418183448217 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.