In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion.
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the fact that in academic career, grouping students according to their academic capabilities are suitable for students to enhance their abilities in effective environment. Critics, however, claim that catagorizing students according to their capabilities in a group is just to promote the sense of competition among youngsters. I, personally believe that later argument is more realistic and worth to believe. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the main features of this statement before deducing final conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of argument discussing the fact that grouping students with particular capabilities is beneficial for students or not. Firstly, the conspicuous one stem from the fact that for primary and secondary education, grading students according with their academic careers is the way to deviate from their right path to the world of competition. As a prime example, according to the recent research from the department of psychology, children adapt very effective behavior and knowledge from natural environment. Therefore, this proves that exposure to average environment with different capability levels are more beneficial to grasp maximum of knowledge.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that in this contemporary world, where at every step there is a big challenge and effective way to deal with these challenges is the proper exposure to experience different situations.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that grouping people with academic capabilities is in the suitable option to give directions to their abilities. Therefore, ideas that will bring benefit would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 518, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lieve. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the main features of this statement before ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, so, therefore, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68045112782 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02629710918 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56015037594 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1191423779 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.363636364 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186938175611 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695776259088 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824513015243 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109207184333 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726914924597 0.0609392437508 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.