In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. Do you agree or disagree?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the fact that in town and cities, large shoping malls are better alternate than small shops. Critics, however, claim that local shops are more suitable option for customers to buy things. In my opinion, former argument is more realistic and worth to believe. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the important feature of this statement before deducing any conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments associated with the fact that shopping from large malls would be more convinient and feaseble for customers. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that under one roof people can enjoy shopping from their favourite brands. Moreover, play areas and food courts are another favourable options in shopping malls to avoid congestion in one shop. As a prime example, centaurus mall has the facility of playing some indoor games for kids of all ages and a cinema to provide entertaiment to viewers with good shopping experience.
Another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that parking facilities are always available in every big mall to avoid congestion and traffic issues. In addition, seperate rest rooms are available there for both male and female to facilitate them.
To recapitulate, forgoing discussion propounds that shoping experience is always better in larger shopping malls in cities and towns. Therefore, ideas that will bring benefits would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 377, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lieve. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the important feature of this statement bef...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., play areas and food courts are another favourable options in shopping malls to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26970954357 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61197963817 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630705394191 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7790286186 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.833333333 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236887890012 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766720084076 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675279298967 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119570569666 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677116124837 0.0609392437508 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.