In town and cities the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop Do you agree or disagree

With the development of science and technology, shopping styles also changed for the benefit of mankind. There is a heated debate whether small shops should be replaced with colossal shopping malls. This essay will discuss convenience for the public as a merit of shopping malls and higher price as a disadvantage.

Shopping at a department store is a pleasant experience and it saves time. Ample parking facilities are available and all the items are available under one roof. People visit large shopping complexes with their families and participate in recreational activities such as watching movies and playing certain games in addition to purchasing food, clothes and other items. Therefore, shopping mall concept fulfills additional human necessities and make human lives easier.

On the other hand, some items in shopping malls are rather expensive. The investment on infrastructure and maintenance cost of a modern shopping centre is immense compared to a traditional shop. Same food items are available in small boutiques or traditional fair at a cheaper price. Hence, increased price is a disadvantage of large shopping complexes.

In summary, customers are able to experience a fun filled enjoyment in mall culture in addition to buying items even if prices are expensive. In my opinion, although prices are higher, due to the convenience and affluent background and hygienic environment big stores should be promoted instead of small shops.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, therefore, in addition, in summary, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 5.94088669951 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 20.9802955665 19% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44933920705 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93984136237 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621145374449 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3360578069 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1538461538 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4615384615 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297598812636 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110302305166 0.0925447433944 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755469145142 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178898963668 0.151781067708 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078420222334 0.0609392437508 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.