In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently the phenomenon of replacing small shops with big shopping mall and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of shopping center is highly beneficial, such issue is thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I profoundly inclined to believe that having chain malls in the cities can be a plus, and this essay will examine both sides of this issue by providing some academic evidence before concluding.
On the one hand, from social standpoint, shopping centers can provide the society with some noticeable benefits which are rooted in the fact that having access to many brands at the same time as well as easy accessible by providing many parking lot, are undeniably bound up. Moreover, it could lead to avoiding traffic congestion and as a consequences, lead to decreasing air pollution. According to an academic survey conducted by Tehran University, more than 80% of the people who were visiting mega malls, are tend to visit there again because of high-level of satisfactory.
On the other hand, within the realm of socioeconomic science, buying from big shopping center could lead to wasting money. Furthermore, building big malls could lead to rising unemployment rate among local marketers who run small shops. Not to mention that, this kind of supermarkets could be sign of unfair distribution of wealth between different parts of the society.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that although some opponents argue that the big shopping centers, has negative social and economic impacts, I highly tend to believe that the merits of having some big centers in city are outweigh its disadvantages. Of course, the role of authorities to rising public awareness are of importance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a consequence' or simply 'consequences'?
Suggestion: a consequence; consequences
...d to avoiding traffic congestion and as a consequences, lead to decreasing air pollution. Acco...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...eople who were visiting mega malls, are tend to visit there again because of high-le...
^^^^
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
... of having some big centers in city are outweigh its disadvantages. Of course, the role ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, kind of, of course, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 31.9359605911 153% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91328342137 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3940730605 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.454545455 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147937951961 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574028729431 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756641580436 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881893567049 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589023714924 0.0609392437508 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.