Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the fact that medical intertventions are greatly responsible to increase life expectancy in humans. Some people, opine that this trend is beneficial for our society, specifically to save the life of mother and a child. However, this essay will assert some of the highlighting features of this statement before deducing any conclusion. I personally believe that this argument is more realistic and worth to believe.
At the outset, there are of myriad of arguments associated with advancement in medical technology and life expectency rates. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that improvements in medical interventions and introduction of highly equipped intruments, it is now possible to deal with serious illnesses in no time. As a prime example, introduction of laproscopy makes procedures more accurate to see and operate the depth of structure. Moreover, cardiac bypass surgery increases the life expectancy of heart patient to such an extent, that would once impossible with this.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that maternity related issues are easily handled by gynaecologists and surgeons, which includes, controlling of increase blood pressure and feotal distress syndromes. Owing to highly qualified staff and latest interventions, life expectancy increases to greater extent.
To recapitulate, forgoing discussion propounds that advancement in technology has strong and beneficial influence on human’s health. Thus, ideas that will bring benefit would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... child. However, this essay will assert some of the highlighting features of this statement...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 246.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69512195122 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11356905303 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642276422764 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4070558447 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.75 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155700491618 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533347190501 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520372474423 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839825714943 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220811329544 0.0609392437508 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.