In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge amongh the prodigies discussing the fact that in this contemporary world, people rely more on cashless transections than to carry cash. However, some people opine that this is welcomming trend for certain crimes. Critics, however claim that cashless economy has more advantages which triumph over disadvantages. In this essay, I shall highlight some merits and demerits of this statement.
At the outset there are myriad of arguments associated with cashless dependent society. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that it’s an easy access for current society to use it safely at any time and anywhere. Moreover, it reduces serious crimes, which includes snatching and robbery. As a prime example, according to the recent survey from criminal Investigation department, over the last decades, snatching and robbery have greatly reduced due to tracking of black money and immediate blocking in case of snatching of credit or debit cards.
On the other hand, another pivotal fact pertaining to this argument is that credit cards are just the available option for urban population. Furthermore, due to this advanced facility people are more exposed to cyber fraud. But this statement doesnot hold fully water. Perhaps these are just rare exceptions rather than common assumption.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that benefits of cashless transections are quiet high than drawbacks for this society. Thus , ideas that will bring benefits would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... contemporary world, people rely more on cashless transections than to carry cash...
^^
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sh. However, some people opine that this is welcomming trend for certain crimes. ...
^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'easy access'.
Suggestion: easy access
...s one stem from the fact that it's an easy access for current society to use it safely at...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...gh than drawbacks for this society. Thus , ideas that will bring benefits would be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, so, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52521008403 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7557376035 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680672268908 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.7929311693 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9285714286 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.9669160288 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282201994294 0.242375264174 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081508817329 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558839738652 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145406384241 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604912896809 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.