Personal Development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the fact personal development is the root of professional life and career building. In my opinion, this statement is more realistic and worth to believe. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the important features of this statement before deducing a final conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments discussing the fact that professional achievements have a strong connection with personal development. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that well behaved and groomed personality has a strong impact on professional life and it would be beneficial for career perspectives. As a prime example, according to the recent research, while conducting interviews to famous business tycons all around the world, every single personality credits his success to personal development, in which Bill Gates is one of among them.
Another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that personal development is achieved through hard work and desire to fullfil the personal dreams. Therefore, dedicated hard work is the key to achieve the desire goal in life. Moreover, professional development needs personal skills to build the perfect career for stable life.
To recapitulate. the foregoing discussion propounds that personal development is not only one of the leading cause of success in professional life but also a required element for career perspectives. Therefore, ideas that will bring benefits would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lieve. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the important features of this statement be...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...er for stable life. To recapitulate. the foregoing discussion propounds that per...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53389830508 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04545191438 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593220338983 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4308604017 50.4703680194 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.727272727 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257937086398 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926999477175 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957510209042 0.071462118173 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160686977909 0.151781067708 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380626496579 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.