Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age of competetion, personal and professional development are two correlated factors. While some people agree that personal development forms the basis for professional growth, there exists certain contentions regarding the same, among another chunk of people. I am strongly inclined to believe that the power residing in the personal growth can aid in the flourishment of professional refinement. This article shall critique both sides of the debate before arriving at a plausible conclusion.
In the onset of industrialization and technology, the relation between personal and professional progress should not be underrated. Personal and professional upsurge are positively correlated. For instance, the soft skill development wing in MNCs provide concrete evidence for the mammoth role played by personality development in ones' career. A person who has a sound personality is more likely to ascend the corporate ladder more swiftly than his counterparts. Personality plays a sea role in professional establishment.
On contrary, relatively small portion of public opinionates that personal and professional development are unrelated. This is exemplified taking into account a fewer population who have tasted success, although they had a shaded personality.
By diligently analyzing the above points of view, it can be indubitably proved that personal developemnt augments professional success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...le played by personality development in ones career. A person who has a sound person...
^^^^
Line 13, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rsonal developemnt augments professional success.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 206.0 242.827586207 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.93689320388 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37777929537 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665048543689 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4610878164 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.916666667 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 7.25397266985 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306772960961 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113256620653 0.0925447433944 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832097235035 0.071462118173 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163658555629 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815100367147 0.0609392437508 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 53.1260098522 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.