Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, a phenomenon of self development and its correcponding impact has sparked an ongoing controversy which inevitably leads to a moot question, what is required to advance in professionalism? where some believe that personal development is the key to success, however, many holds a contrary view. In this essay the topic will be discuss with related examples.
From the social standpoint, knowledge and self grooming has provided a noticeable effect in the society which are rooted in the fact that great sense of professionalism and higher achievements are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an experiment which discovered that eighty percent of people in Australia succeed in their career due to significant personality. Thus beneficial ramification of personal development as a base for future can be seen.
Within the realm of profession, some hold an opposite view and tend to believe that how much one is self groomed if the person have not work in the field, success will not follow. Moreover fundamental aspects of professional experience increase the consequence of highest rank in job sectors. As a tangible example, a research undertaken by an prestigious university asserted that people has the self development in a working environment has a greater probability of uprise in career . Hence it is correct to presume the preconceived notion that self development can be aggressive in some circumstances.
To conclude, I profoundly believe that the benefits of personal development far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only helping to carry out the self knowledge but also allowing to rectify the common issues. Hence, it is acting as a base for one’s career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Where
...required to advance in professionalism? where some believe that personal development ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... career due to significant personality. Thus beneficial ramification of personal dev...
^^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... in the field, success will not follow. Moreover fundamental aspects of professional exp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the highest'.
Suggestion: of the highest
...nal experience increase the consequence of highest rank in job sectors. As a tangible exam...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...gible example, a research undertaken by an prestigious university asserted that pe...
^^
Line 5, column 484, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... greater probability of uprise in career . Hence it is correct to presume the prec...
^^
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...eater probability of uprise in career . Hence it is correct to presume the preconceiv...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rectifying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: rectifying
...ut the self knowledge but also allowing to rectify the common issues. Hence, it is acting ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33695652174 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24518416561 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619565217391 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4941225098 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.307692308 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76923076923 7.25397266985 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276418260574 0.242375264174 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974162301207 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856142490359 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168177375532 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368253296448 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.