Technological innovations have affected our lives. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently a phenomenon of technological advancement has sparked an ongoing debate which leads to a moot question, is ever growing inventions is changing our lives? Where some agree with it, however many hold its opposite view. I am inclined to believe and agree on this topic and I will be further discussing with related examples.
From the social standpoint, technological era has become a life changer which has provided a noticeable effect in the society which can rooted in fact that better living style and extraordinary connections are inevitably bound up. According to my experience when I was a university student I performed an experiment which discovered that technological innovation such as mobile phones has reconnected lost connections, everything is getting control from one source and computers which has stepped into every field such as hospitals, schools, offices and much more are making life faster and accurate. Thus, beneficial ramification of innovations as a helpful resource can be seen.
Within the realm of science, changes through advancement of technology also acting as a curse which include the consequence of people misguide. Moreover fundamental aspects of technology as source of destruction in one’s life can pertain to long term technical issues. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by some prestigious has asserted that downside of innovation can destroy a life through misusing mobiles and social media, blackmailing one another through some videos, virtually relating one with another and much more. Hence, it is correct to presume the notion of technology misinterpreting are clearly visible in anyone’s life.
To end, there are several compelling arguments on both side, but the benefits of technological innovations far outweigh its drawback. it can be observed that technology not only helping one to rise in career but also creating strong bonds.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ur life's. Where some agree with it , however many hold its opposite view. I ...
^^
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...s;s. Where some agree with it , however many hold its opposite view. I am inclined to bel...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
...e discussing with related examples. from the social standpoint, technological er...
^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...he consequence of people misusing them. Moreover fundamental aspects of technology as so...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 663, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... clearly visible in anyone's life. To end, there are several compelling arg...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... innovations far out ways its drawback. it can be observed that technology not onl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45084745763 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06932322661 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630508474576 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.8600154503 50.4703680194 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.25397266985 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127210434845 0.242375264174 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516470160977 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0179609960012 0.071462118173 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836819737608 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191902588064 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.