Nowadays environmental problems are too big to be managed by individual persons or
individual countries. In other words, it is an international problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of environmental issues has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question, is it responsibility of individual person or a nation to keep environment healthy? where it is held view that every single person contribution is essential, however many hold its opposite view. In this essay both sides of the argument will be examine with related reasons and example.
From social standpoint, role of an single person can give a noticeable effect in the society which are rooted in the fact that sole contribution set a counterpart to global level which are inextricably bound up. According to my experience when I was a university student I performed an academic experiment which discovered pollutions, industrial harmful gas emission and many more can be treated if proper guidance or strict rules to offer to an individual level from goverment organisation. This beneficial ramification of individual impact to solve environmental issues are seen.
Within the realm of global arena, the problems are taking place from smaller to higher scale which cannot only be treated by internationally. Smaller issues such as smoking cigarettes, Use of automobiles to bigger one such as deforestation, industrialisation etc are playing pivotal role in destroying environment, which is showing individual contribution in environment leading into international issue. Moreover fundamental aspects of global issues can give an overall graph, which undoubtably leads to miss guidance as every problem vary from nation to nation. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of international solution correlate negatively. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of environmental statistics.
To conclude there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of individual person far outweighs. Not only the advantage of sole person contribution leads to international solution but also pin point create healthy environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Where
... a nation to keep environment healthy? where it is held view that every single perso...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...rson contribution is essential, however many hold its opposite view. In this essay both s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ple. From social standpoint, role of an single person can give a noticeable eff...
^^
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...nment leading into international issue. Moreover fundamental aspects of global issues ca...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 5.75862068966 365% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1207.87684729 147% => OK
No of words: 313.0 242.827586207 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68690095847 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35224013273 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607028753994 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 379.143842365 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7830715406 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.923076923 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17121513259 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600175303352 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0236538744479 0.071462118173 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105658467937 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0109310865455 0.0609392437508 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 53.1260098522 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.