One of the most conspicuous trends of the today's world is the colossal upsurge in the number of people believing in technological equipment's are imperative in classroom. There is widespread worry that this will only lead to myriad concerns in one's life. I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favor of my stance. The most prepondarent is one that the increasing computer uses in upcoming years can not only contribute to improvement of today's generation, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various field. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only one can benefit more when it comes to being effictive, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all the merits stand in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
There are, however, some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm potential benefit of vanishing teachers posts. The primary one stems from the fact that by observing the aforementioned trend, people have not only realised its gravity, but also gauged the mangitude of its repercussion when it comes to today's ever-changing lifestyle. Besides its impact on loss of jobs and cultural loss of teaching is far-reaching indeed. Hence, it is apparent why many are against the over uses of computer.
In view of the argument outlined above, one can conclude that despite some drawbacks the benefits of computer uses are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...is will only lead to myriad concerns in ones life. I do not entirely accept this and...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rosperity and excellence is concerned. There are, however, some pitfalls that c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02661596958 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79924873695 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585551330798 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2937016517 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.166666667 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168679218602 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514607226292 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458274122657 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924234523588 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316195161484 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.