The evaluation method of student performance has always been an area of contention around the world. Many people believe that students should be evaluated using regular projects and assignments. Many others believe in having a written examination to grade students on their performance. In this essay, we will discuss on why formal written evaluation is not the best approach to evaluate students.
Many teaching institutions still follow the approach of having regular exams to assess and grade students. This kind of assessment creates a lot of pressure on students mind to memorize concepts few days before exams. Many students rather than understanding the subject, study to perform well in exam. The practical application of the subject is not tested due to these kind of assessments. Most of the educational institutions in developing countries, such as India and China follow formal written assessment for students. As a result of this, many students who are good with application of subject don't get good grades.
With the changing times, many institutions are doing away with regular exams to assess students and are instead focusing on practical project work and assignments to evaluate students. Many primary schools now don't have a ranking system. Regular projects and homework assignments helps them to build their skill on subject. As a result of this,
Students can focus on learning the subject rather than faring well in exams.
As written exams are slowly diminishing from education system. Assessing students in a practical manner is more effective to judge students capabilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e best approach to evaluate students. Many teaching institutions still follow ...
^^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind memorizing'.
Suggestion: mind memorizing
...t creates a lot of pressure on students mind to memorize concepts few days before exams. Many st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ion of the subject is not tested due to these kind of assessments. Most of the educational...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 601, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ho are good with application of subject dont get good grades. With the changing...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion of subject dont get good grades. With the changing times, many institutio...
^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...uate students. Many primary schools now dont have a ranking system. Regular projects...
^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r skill on subject. As a result of this, Students can focus on learning the subj...
^^^
Line 6, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ect. As a result of this, Students can focus on learning the subject rather tha...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ject rather than faring well in exams. As written exams are slowly diminishing ...
^^^
Line 8, column 83, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a practical manner" with adverb for "practical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...om education system. Assessing students in a practical manner is more effective to judge students cap...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
still, well, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34901960784 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84704261865 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541176470588 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 410.4 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9648898453 50.4703680194 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.25 104.977214359 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9375 20.9669160288 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 7.25397266985 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.33497536946 187% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 2.91625615764 309% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167386613558 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612589916418 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748097305743 0.071462118173 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936827036665 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660253356934 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.1260098522 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.