The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems. What are the underlying causes? Who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual?
Recently, the phenomenon of various problems regarding the environment and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the climate change can be a plus, and I will discuss causes and solutions of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the climate change can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of complex issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. As per my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus beneficial ramifications of both this remarkable phenomenon and complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the climate change might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the faulty system could relate to this reality that the demerits of unnecessary usages pertain to health problems. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is negatively correlated with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this common phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the government far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes but also pinpoint social implications
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | davood mohammadi | 11 | view |
| 2019-05-12 | namdevjd1 | 75 | view |
| 2019-01-19 | lalacamargo1 | 88 | view |
| 2018-12-28 | dhavalpatel095 | 85 | view |
| 2018-12-28 | dhavalpatel095 | 11 | view |
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner to improve the networks of public transport? 85
- Should digital media replace textbooks? what are the reviews and possible solutions. 88
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing??What are the reasons for that? 85
- More information available online so library's books are useless? Agree or disagree? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ment which discovered current policies. Thus beneficial ramifications of both this r...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61977186312 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1467915838 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650190114068 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5997746743 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.166666667 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0511062887365 0.242375264174 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0178998785514 0.0925447433944 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0236706278116 0.071462118173 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0294042708883 0.151781067708 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220781712105 0.0609392437508 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.04 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.