Medical technology can increase the human's life expectancy. Is it a blessing or a curse?
Recently, the phenomenon of, medical technology can increase the human's life expectancy and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that medical technology can be a plus, and I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, medical technology can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered vocational education. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, medical technology might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of practical learning could relate to this reality that the demerits of a laboratory experiment pertain to the intellectual development. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of medical technology far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-10-26 | angelstrack | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | bashirheidari | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | bashirheidari | 77 | view |
| 2019-05-21 | crycoffee | 85 | view |
- building more roads to allow more vehicle owner to improve the networks of public transport? agree or disagree? 85
- The means of communicating in society today has changed markedly over the last ten years. In your opinion, what are the positive and negative impacts of this change? 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
- Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion? 88
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...of, medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy and its corresponding i...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90494296578 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33537023262 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642585551331 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4885167603 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.416666667 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208104379901 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731905548237 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956052754059 0.071462118173 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118517231814 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745603247982 0.0609392437508 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.04 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.