'Environmental problems are too great to be managed by individuals so real change can only be achieved at government level.'
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience.
Nowadays there are various types of environmental problems including air, water and noise pollution which have to address immediately. Who are the responsible party to solve environmental problems, government or individuals? In this essay I’m going to discuss my opinions on above matter.
To begin with today's world is facing environmental related issues starting from small scale up to a level that have to be handled by expertise. Almost all inland water bodies are now polluted because of irresponsible discharges to them. People don’t have any fresh air to breathe as almost all the factories release their flue gasses in to atmosphere. These issues are getting worst day by day now come to a level that general public cannot handle. For example, the damage in the ozone layer is a result of long term bad environmental practices but now too great to handle by individuals. Moreover because of the rise in global temperature glaciers are now melting and small island are in a risk of sinking. These types of problems must be addressed not as even the countries but as a world.
In addition, there some problems that can be solved in house levels. People have to rethink before dump garbage on roads which create a series of health issues as well as land pollution. Governments also have a big role to play in this series matter. As government is the legislative it has responsibility to put necessary rules and regulations to protect environment.
To conclude I think it is the responsibility of both government and individuals to save the environment as nobody can live without mother nature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'getting the worst'.
Suggestion: getting the worst
...sses in to atmosphere. These issues are getting worst day by day now come to a level that gen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...rst day by day now come to a level that general public cannot handle. For example, the damage ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 595, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...now too great to handle by individuals. Moreover because of the rise in global temperatu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, well, for example, i think, in addition, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0447761194 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96118236938 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615671641791 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2872782731 50.4703680194 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.1333333333 104.977214359 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17805735127 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556868538053 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404816727947 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981841631132 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218577046573 0.0609392437508 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.