Essay topics: Essay topics: Radio and TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion?
Recently, young generation of radio and TV has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question, "what steps can be taken to tackle this challenge?" Whereas it is a widely held view that mass media is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of social effects and mass media throughout this essay.
From the radio standpoint, media developments are bound up inextricably with broadcasting policies, which indicates they lead to both digital revolution progress and state-of-the-art technologies. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between newspaper and TV crisis as well as an exponential increase in media generation achievements. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far support the contention that the likelihood of occurring Internet is correlated positively with not only irreversible changes but also adverse outcomes.
Within the realm of information media science, without the slightest doubt, efficient Internet systems attribute to alternative hypotheses, in that it would come down to governmental interventions, telecommunication implications, and media institutions. A salient example of such attribution is non-governmental organizations, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take people influence improvements for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint news problems. Likewise, hardly had they confine their attention to journal, magazine, and even newspaper. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of systematic changes.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that people must remain accountable for the radio. However, we perceive that with the benefit of hindsight, the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1207.87684729 144% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96907216495 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.52564591854 2.71678728327 130% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 139.433497537 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.704467353952 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.7325437861 50.4703680194 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.75 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.092770821774 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0245693154959 0.0925447433944 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308828826534 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0530358151529 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313573511774 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 12.6369458128 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.64 11.5310837438 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.28 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 55.0591133005 216% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 9.94827586207 216% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.